HomeChurch StaffSermonsBible Doctrine
Exposing_the_Evolution_MythExposing the Word of Faith MovementOur Christian Heritage as a NationChristian Films
Contact InformationLinksYouth Activities Page

                                        Exposing the Jehovah's Witness Cult 

Their Founder 

   Charles Taze Russell was born on February 16th, 1852 and he died on October 31st, 1916.  
In July of 1879, he began publishing a monthly religious journal called "Zion's Watchtower 
and Herald of Christ' Presence" this eventually evolved into what it is called today "The Watchtower Announcing Jehovah's Kingdom." 

    a. Financial Motivations

   I have chosen to begin this webpage with their Founder, because I have found his character 
to be highly questionable.   He was raised as a Presbyterian, but he began to question their 
beliefs about predestination and eternal judgment early in his life.  He eventually became associated with an Adventist group that predicted that the Lord would return in the year 1874.  
In 1876, Russell and a man by the name of Nelson Barbour combined their wealth and devoted themselves to publishing materials related to their belief that the Lord would return and the dead would be raised in 1878.   Some say that Russell sold a chain of clothing stores and supplied 
the financial capital for this venture in the amount of $300,000.00 (U.S. equivalent of 7 Million Dollars
in 2010).   That sounds generous, but the claim has been disputed.  Others claim that the organization started with only $5,000.00 in capital.  A man by the name of William H. Conley, 
who was the co-owner of the Riter-Conley Company in Allegheny provided $3,500.00, Joseph Russell $1000.00 and Charles Taze Russell $500.00 (1).   In addition to this, as early as 1892, Russell's views and management style were strongly criticized by certain individuals associated with him.  They accused Russell of being a dictatorial leader, a shrewd businessman who appeared eager to collect funds from the selling of the Millennial Dawn books, that he had cheated one of them out of financial gains, and that he issued thousands of Millennial Dawn books under 
a female pseudonym.  A booklet entitled  "A Conspiracy Exposed and Harvest Siftings"  was written by Russell and issued as an extra to the April 1894 Zion's Watch Tower magazine in order 
to preempt attempts to have their views circulated to a wider audience of Bible Students (2).          Another interesting event occurred on November 1st, 1916.  This is when a newspaper called 
"The Brooklyn Daily Eagle" published an article accusing Charles Taze Russell of a scam involving the sale of "Miracle Wheat" seeds for $1.00 a pound (quite expensive in that day) claiming that these seeds could produce five times as much wheat as the average seed.  The newspaper also published a cartoon picturing the 'Pastor' and his 'Miracle Wheat' in such a way that Pastor Russell became offended and brought a lawsuit against the newspaper for libel asking them 
for $100,000.00 in damages.  Russell lost this lawsuit due to the fact that the government investigated and found that the wheat "was not miraculous or overly excellent."  Russell claimed that he received no revenue from the sale of the miracle wheat, and that no one had been disappointed with the product or had returned it which they could have done.   The revenue, 
as Russell claimed,  went to the Watchtower Society.   It should be noted, however, that Charles Taze Russell owned 990 of the 1,000 shares of the Watchtower Society Stock; so, in reality, he 
did benefit from the sale of it (3).    In Addition to this, on February 19th, 1912, the Brooklyn Daily
Eagle reported that Russell traveled extensively and sent back sermons that he supposedly
delivered back to the United States.   The Eagle contended that Russell never delivered these
sermons in places like Hawaii to a "large audience."  The Editor of the Hawaiian Star wrote
that Russell appeared for a few hours in Hawaii but didn't make his expected public address.
This was typical of many other documented accounts. (4) 

  b. Sexual Misconduct

      Charles Taze Russell was married to Maria Frances Ackley on March 13th, 1879.  In 1897 they separated, following disagreements over her insistence for a greater role in the management of Zion's Watch Tower magazine.  In 1913, Mrs. Russell sued for a divorce on 
the grounds of "his conceit, egotism, domination, and improper conduct in relation to other women."  Upon hearing the evidence, the judge ruled in her favor.  

When the fact that Pastor Russell's wife was suing him for a separation became public much general interest was aroused and the courtroom was thronged during the proceedings.

The testimony which elicited the most comment concerned the relations of Pastor Russell with Rose Ball, a young woman stenographer employed by Pastor Russell in the Bible House on Arch Street. This testimony was given by Mrs. Russell on direct examination on Thursday, April 26, 1906. It was ruled out by the court on the ground that the incidents to which reference was made were said to have occurred on a date which precedes the dates mentioned in Mrs. Russell's bill of complaint. Pastor Russell recurred to the incidents when he went on the stand several days later, and gave his version of what had happened. Rose Ball was not called to the stand, as she left for Australia shortly before the case came to trial.

The verbatim record of this testimony taken from the official report of the case on file in the office of the Prothonotary of Allegheny County is as follows:

Q. I want you to tell us what your husband did in company with this woman Rose, in your presence and in your home.

A. In the first place I considered it--(objected to and witness was not permitted to finish.)

Q. Tell us what you saw and what he said was done.

Pastor's Wife Tells of His Alleged Nightly Visits

Q. You state that you found him doing this at other times. How often after that?

A. I found him a number of times; I don't remember how often.

Q. In her room?

A. Yes, sir. And I found him in the servant girl's room as well. and I found him locked in the servant girl's room.

Q. Did he make any explanation why he was in the girl's room?

A. No. He did not; he just got angry.

Q. What did you say to him about this conduct and what did he say.

A. I said to him, "We have a great work on our hands," and I said, "In this work you and I have to walk very circumspectly before the world and if you are going to do things like this, what will happen? Suppose you are all right, don't you suppose people will talk about things like this?" and I said, "I am not satisfied with it," and he said he wasn't going to be ruled by me. But I felt distressed about that.

Q. What did Rose do at the Watch Tower.

A. She attended to the correspondence.

Q. Where was her desk with reference to the desk of Mr. Russell of the Watch Tower Society?

A. It wasn't near his; it was in the office.

Q. When would he go to the Watch Tower, in the morning?

A. I don't remember; he generally went down alone.

Q. Who would return with him?

A. She came with him in the evening and they came about 11 o'clock and the young men that were in the office -- she was the only girl, and the young men would go home, and he wouldn't allow her to go home with them, and she must wait and always go with him.

(Objected to.) Q. I want the mere fact, did this girl Rose go home with your husband?

A. Yes, Sir.

Q. What year was that?

A. In the fall of 1894. (By Mr. Porter, attorney for the plaintiff.)

Q. Did you state to your husband at this meeting any endearing terms?

A. Yes, sir.

Q. What were they?

A. I said "She tells me that one evening you came home --" I asked her when did these things occur. I said to him, "She says they occurred down at the office when she stayed down there with him in the evening after the rest had gone, and at home at any time when I wasn't around."

Q. Now, about the endearing terms?

Q. What other terms were used?

Q. And the young men came home ahead of them?

A. Yes, sir.

Q. State to the court and jury what talk, if any, you had with this girl Rose, in regard to her relations with your husband, which you communicated to your husband?

This question was objected to and it was changed to read as follows: Q. You are to tell what you stated to your husband that Rose had said and his reply to you.

Mrs. Russell Says Girl Told Her of Pastor's Caresses.

A. I told him that I had learned something that was very serious and I didn't tell him right away. I let a day elapse until I felt I had control of myself and could talk and then I told him that I had something very serious to tell him about this matter, and he said, "What is it?" and I said, "Rose has told me that you have been intimate with her, that you have been in the habit of hugging and kissing her and having her sit on your knee and fondling each other, and she tells me you bid her under no account to tell me, but she couldn't keep it any longer. She said if I was distressed about it she felt that she would have to come and make a confession to me, and she has done that. (By the court.)

Q. What did he say?

A. He tried to make light of it at first and I said, "Husband, you can't do that. I know the whole thing. She has told me straight and I know it to be true." Well, he said he was sorry; it was true, but he was sorry. He said he didn't mean any harm. I said, "I don't see how you could do an act like that without meaning harm."

In his book entitled, "Jehovah's Witnesses" by Maurice Barnett, it is pointed out that Russell
tried to avoid paying alimony to his ex-wife by transferring all of his wealth to the Watchtower
society which he controlled.   He wrote, 

   "She had to sue again to get her allotted alimony when Russell had all his property 
     transferred to the Society.  Russell had turned all of his assets over to the Society 
     so she would be left with nothing.  Great guy!" 

Some Food for Thought 
Regarding the Jehovah's
Witnesses Cult                      --> 
    c. Documented Perjury

        Another matter that brings Charles Taze Russell's character into question is the fact that
he perjured himself in court.   In 1912, a Pastor from Ontario named Reverend J.J. Ross released an enlightening pamphlet exposing Russell's lack of qualifications as a minister, and his shaky theological teachings. Ross exposed Russell as an inferior scholar who "never attended the higher schools of learning, knows comparatively nothing of philosophy, systematic or historical theology, and is totally ignorant of the dead languages." Out of pure fury, Russell sued Ross for defamatory purposes. Russell was unable to present evidence to deny these words from Ross, 
leaving only his own statements made under oath. The pamphlet was read during the trial, 
and Russell denied everything stated within it except for the Miracle Wheat scandal where Russell actually stated that this was "a grain of truth in a sense". Although Russell had sworn under oath to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth, the evidence is overwhelming that he did not. As the cross examination continued, Russell further contradicted himself:

        In regards to this subject, we should not overlook the fact that Russell claimed to have
translated the Bible more accurately than any Greek scholar of his day.   How could this 
be possible since it was proven that he did not even know the Greek alphabet.   In my conversations with Jehovah's Witnesses, they have typically pointed out that their founder
was never prosecuted for perjury.    I suppose this is true.  But does this change the fact
that he obviously lied under oath?   It's a matter of public record.

       By now, I hope that you can see why I started with their founder.   The evidence seems
to be mounted against him, and it is not pretty.  He is depicted as promoting at least one financial scam through the Watchtower Magazine,  using ministry funds for personal 
and exotic travelling excursions (Like Hawaii), being an adulterer and a womanizer, 
being divorced by his wife for this reason as well as others, trying to avoid paying alimony 
by transferring all of his finances into the watchtower society which he controlled and lying under oath.  In my opinion, none of this passes the "smell test." 
Some More Food for Thought
Regarding the Jehovah's Witness
Cult                                                         --> 
I have featured the previous video, because I believe that this man made an excellent point.
The Jehovah's Witnesses try to insinuate that our Christian belief in the trinity is what theologians refer to as "modalism."   This is the idea that the Father literally became Jesus
the Son, and that He left heaven and came to this earth.    It is true that Jesus said to His disiciple Phillip, "...'if you've seen Me, you've seen the Father" in John 14:9.   Jesus also made statements like this one, however, that is found in John 5:19; He said,  "Therefore Jesus answered 
and was saying to them, 'Truly, truly, I say to you, the Son can do nothing of Himself, 
unless it is something He sees the Father doing; for whatever the Father does, these things 
the Son also does in like manner.'"     This helps us to understand that Jesus did not act 
independently from the Father's instructions; He is equal to the Father in terms of His Deity 
and though a separate personage within the trinity, they act in unison.    The example I like 
to use is that of a husband and wife being called "one flesh" in the scriptures.   My wife 
and I are separate persons, but we act in unison regarding our decision making.   Our Christian belief  in the trinity is described well in the old hymn entitled "Holy, Holy, Holy"  which refers 
to our God as, and I quote "God in three persons blessed trinity." 

Their Prophet

      The Jehovah's Witnesses claim that their magazine "The Watchtower" is a Prophet.  The evidence for this can be found in a Watchtower publication which is dated April 1st, 1972. It

     "He had a 'prophet' to warn them. This 'prophet' was not one man, but was a body of men
and women.  It was the small group of footstep followers of Jesus Christ, known at the time
as the International Bible Students.  Today, they are known as Jehovah's Christian Witnesses."

    Another example of this is found in a book published by the Jehovah's Witnesses entitled
"The Nations Will Know That I am Jehovah."  On page 58 of this publication, it says...

    "Who is Ezekiel's present day counterpart, whose message and conduct coorespond with 
that of that ancient prophet of Jehovah?   Of whom today was he a 'sign' or 'portent'?  Not
of some individual man, but of a group of people.  Being made up of a unified company
of persons, the modern Ezekiel is a composite personage, made up of many members, just 
the same as the human body is" 

    It is important for us to establish this fact, because the Bible has some specific things to say
about the role of a true prophet as opposed to a false prophet, and this is found in the Old
Testament book of Deuteronomy 18:20-22 which says this.

     "20 'But the prophet who speaks a word presumptuously in My name which I have not 
      commanded him to speak, or which he speaks in the name of other gods, that prophet 
      shall die.' 21 "You may say in your heart, 'How will we know the word which the Lord has 
      not spoken?' 22 "When a prophet speaks in the name of the Lord, if the thing does not 
      come about or come true, that is the thing which the Lord has not spoken. The prophet 
      has spoken it presumptuously; you shall not be afraid of him" 

    I want you to notice that the true Prophet of God is required to be right 100% of the time 
when he speaks in the name of the Lord.  If he was wrong even once, he was to be designated
as a false prophet, and he was to be put to death.   This can only mean one thing in reference
to Jehovah's Witnesses, and that is that their magazine "The Watchtower" is indeed a false
Prophet.    For you see, the Jehovah's Witnesses through this magazine are known for setting 
specific dates for the Lord's return and none of these have occurred.

   In a Watchtower publication dated July 15th, 1894, for example, they predicted that the battle
of Armageddon would occur, and that God's Kingdom would be established on this earth in 
the year 1914.

      "Now, in view of recent labor troubles and threatening anarchy, our readers are writing 
        to know if there may not be a mistake in 1914 date…We see no reason for changing
        the figures - nor could we change them if we would. They are, we believe God’s dates 
        not ours. But bear in mind that the end of 1914 is not  the date for the beginning, but 
        for the end of the time of trouble” 

    The end did not come in 1914; so, they quickly moved the date to the end of the year 1918,
and then again to 1925.   This is found in a book that was published by the Watchtower in 1920.
The title of the book was "Millons Now Living Will Never Die, and it was followed by what is
known historically as "The Millions Campaign."   On page 89, the book says, 

      “As we have heretofore stated, the great jubilee cycle is due to begin in 1925.  At that time, 
        the earthly phase of the kingdom shall be recognized” 

Also, in the Watchtower Publication dated September 1st, 1922 page 262

        "The date 1925 is even more distinctly indicated by the Scriptures because it is fixed
          by the law God gave to Israel. Viewing this present situation in Europe,  one wonders 
          how it will be possible to hold back the explosion much longer: and that even before 
          1925 the great crisis will be reached and probably passed”

Since that time, they have predicted that the Lord will return on other dates as well including....

  . 1957 -  The Watchtower magazine stated that some time between April 16 and 23, 1957, 
                  Armageddon would sweep the world! Millions of persons will perish in its flames 
                  and the land will be scorched.'
  . 1975 -   The Watchtower predicted that Armageddon would occur
  . 1984 -   The Jehovah's Witnesses made sure in 1984 that no one else would be able to top 
                   their record of most wrong doomsday predictions. The Witnesses record is currently 
                   holding at ten. The years are: 1874, 1878, 1881, 1910, 1914, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1975, 
                   and 1984. Lately, the JW's are claiming they're out of the prediction business, but it's
                   hard to teach an old dog new tricks. They'll be back.

Question =  How many times can a Prophet be wrong according to scripture and still be 
                       called a true Prophet?
Answer    =  Zero 

    If a Prophet claims to speak in the name of the Lord and is wrong only once,
    he is to be considered a false Prophet.  And, under the Old Testament system,
    he was supposed to be put to death.

Question = How many times has the Watchtower Magazine, which claims to be a Prophet, 
                      been wrong?
Answer = Over ten times and counting 


Sermon = The Differences Between Christianity and the Jehovah's
                    Witness Cult                                                                                         --> 
Their Heresy 

    a. They Reject Our Scriptures

         I have found that it is almost impossible to reason with members of the Jehovah's Witness
         cult, because they have been taught not to trust any literature except their own.  This is why
         I dealt with the errors in their own predictions first.   These can be found in their own

         Another thing we need to understand is that they have their own version of the Bible called
         "The New World Translation."   Charles Taze Russell, as I already pointed out, claimed to 
         have translated the Bible more accurately than any scholar of his day.  And yet, it was proven
         that he did not even know the Greek alphabet.     They can now claim that other Greek
         scholars have been involved in producing "The New World Translation,"  but it really 
         represents a clear case of doctoring the text to support their own theological heresies.

         So, this is where a basic understanding of the Greek language and an Interlinear Bible     
         may prove to be helpful - if they are willing to listen to you - and this is a big IF.

         John 1:1 and John 1:14 are a good example.

         John 1:1 in the New American Standard Bible reads like this 

         "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God" 

         If any of us should have any doubt about who the Apostle John was referring to as
         "The Word" or literally "The Logos" in Greek, we can look at John 1:14 which says,

         "And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we saw His glory, glory 
            as of the only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth" 

         A quick cross reference with John 3:16  should seal the deal.  Jesus is the "only begotten
         Son of God" and the agent of creation according to John 1:1.   If a Jehovah's Witness 
         were to accept this truth, he would have to recant his beliefs, because only God can
         create the universe and they (JW's) deny the deity of Christ.  So, their so called "Greek
         scholars" have chosen to translate John 1:1 like this...

          "In [the] beginning the Word was, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god.
            In [the] beginning the Word was, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god" 

         That definite article "a"  and that word "god" with a small "g" is heretical, and some 
          so called "Greek Scholar" (and I use that phrase with great sarcasm) has overlooked
          a letter in the Greek text that a Greek student in his first week of study would have 
          clearly recognized.

          This is what the Greek text looks like in an Interlinear Bible

           "En            arche          en          ho          logos        kai           ho         logos
            In           beginning     was       the          Word       and         the         word

             en            pros           ton        theon         kai         theos        en          ho       logos"
             was        toward        the         God          and        God         was        the      Word   

          That little word "ho" (Pronounced "Ha")  that is translated as "The" is of tremendous
           importance.    It can only be translated one way, and that is as the definite article "The."  
          The word "Theos" , of course, from which we get the word "Theology" ( the study
           of God) means "God" - Capital "G."    The Word (Logos) is identified as "THE GOD"
           in John 1:1, and there is no way that a true Greek scholar could deny that.   In fact, 
           I am of the opinion that the definite article "ho" makes this point emphatic. 

           While I am delving into this, I don't want my three semesters of Greek in Seminary
           to go to waste; so, let's take a closer look at the phrase "only begotten" that appears
           in John 1:14 and in John 3:16.   It is a compound word in the Greek; the word
          "Monogenase," and it is properly translated "The only one of His kind."   This means
           that a clear distinction is being made between Jesus as the Divine Son of God, 
           and the only one of His kind, and the rest of us as sons of God or children of God.

           Why make this point?    Well, we need to make this point, because Jehovah's Witnesses
           will bring up verses like this one that is found in Matthew 5:9 which says, 

          "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God" 

          Then, they will say "Ah ha, we are all sons of God just like Jesus; therefore, we cannot
           say that Jesus is divine"  (They may try to sound diplomatic, but this is what they mean)

           As the young people like to say in our time "NOT" - we are sons of God in the sense
           that we are children of God and even joint Heirs with Christ, but we are NOT the
            "Monogenase" we are not the "only one of our kind."   There is only one Divine
            Son of God, in other words, who is equal to God the Father and He is the Lord Jesus.

           Let's move on to another text.  Colossians 1:16-17 reads like this in the New World
           Translation (The Jehovah's Witness doctored version of the scriptures)...

            “16 because by means of him all [other] things were created in the heavens and upon'
                the earth, the things visible and the things invisible, no matter whether they are
                thrones or lordships or governments or authorities. All [other] things have been
                created through him and for him. 17 Also, he is before all [other] things and by
                means of him all [other] things were made to exist” (NWT)

          Does that little word "other" that has been inserted by the Jehovah's Witnesses make
          a difference in how these verses are interpreted?  It most certainly does.   It makes 
          a difference because it leaves room for Jesus to be described as a created being
          who did not pre-exist before all things thereby affirming His Deity.

          This is what those verses look like in the New American Standard Translation 

           "16 For by Him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible 
             and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities — all things 
             have been created through Him and for Him. 17 He is before all things, and in Him 
             all things hold together"  (Colossians 1:16-17) 

         Those verses clearly teach us that Jesus is the agent of creation; everything in the created
          order was made "for Him" , and He is the one holding all of this together.   So, I do not 
          intend to be irreverent when I write this, but  this means the Jesus is the glue that is holding
          this universe together; and of course, only God (with a capital "G") is capable of doing this. 

          Conclusion = The Jehovah's Witnesses have created their own translation of the Bible
                                     that is blatantly inaccurate so that they can justify their heretical belief 
                                     that Jesus is only mortal and not Divine.

  My purpose at this point is not to get involved in the debate over 
  whether the state should dictate what a religious organization believes 
  or practices. I just want to make a simple point, and this is it. 

      b. They Reject Our Savior 

          The Jehovah's Witnesses teach that Jesus was merely a man and not God.  In fact, they 
       actually teach that Jesus was a created Angel, Michael the Archangel to be specific, and 
       that this was his name before he was "created."   At www.watchthetower.com, they offer
       a $144,000.00 cash prize to any Jehovah's Witness who can find one verse in the Bible
       stating that "Jesus is Michael the Archangel."   Of course, they're totally safe, because it
       isn't there.   Teaching that Jesus is a created being is also a very serious error.  My Bible
       teaches that Jesus pre-existed as God.   In John 8:58, Jesus said,

        "Jesus said to them, "Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was born, I am." 

       Please notice that Jesus used what Bible scholars call the "tetragrammaton" to refer 
       to Himself.   This can be traced back to Moses and the burning bush in Exodus 3, 
       because this is when God revealed Himself as "The I AM".   He said to Moses "I AM
       WHO I AM"  (Exodus 3:14).   This is where we get the word "Yahweh" or "Jehovah"
       from.   In Colossians 1:16, the Apostle Paul wrote

        "For by Him (referring to Jesus) all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth,
          visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities — all things 
          have been created through Him and for Him" 

       In their New World Translation, the Jehovah's Witnesses have inserted the word "Other"
       in several places in Colossians 1:16 in order to support their heretical teaching which 
       I just described.
           In addition to these errors, they also teach that Jesus did not die on a cross, but rather,
       a stake; and worst of all, they deny the physical resurrection of Jesus Christ which is
       the cornerstone of our faith.   In 1 Corinthians 15:16-19, Paul wrote, 

        "16 For if the dead are not raised, not even Christ has been raised; 17 and if Christ 
          has not been raised, your faith is worthless; you are still in your sins. 18 Then those
          also who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished. 19 If we have hoped in Christ 
          in this life only, we are of all men most to be pitied"  (Emphasis Added) 

        If Jesus Christ has not been resurrected, our faith is absolutely worthless.  That is what 
        Paul, in essence, is saying, and the Watchtower's teaching that Jesus body was disposed
        of by God, dissolved into elements or atoms and recreated as a "spirit being" three days
        later is absolutely unacceptable.  For you see, this teaching is no different than that which
        the gnostics taught in Biblical times, and the Apostle John called this a teaching of those
        who are quote "antichrist." in 2 John 7.

        "For many deceivers have gone out into the world, those who do not acknowledge 
          Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh. This is the deceiver and the antichrist" 

        The word "coming" in 2 John 7 is a present tense participle; therefore, this tell us that 
        John was referring, not only to the incarnation, but also to Jesus' resurrection as well
        as "the parousia" - the second coming. 
            The Watchtower Society also teaches that Jesus is never called Jehovah in the Bible,
         and that statement is outlandish to those who truly understand the scriptures. For you
         see, every "I Am" statement that appears in the gospel of John is related back to the 
         tetragrammaton which I mentioned earlier.  They all relate back to Exodus 3:14 which
         is when the name "Yahweh" or "Jehovah" is first presented, and there are many.

         "I Am the bread of life"  John 6:48

         "I Am the light of the world"  John 8:12

         "I Am the door" John 10:9

         "I Am the Good Shepherd" John 10:11

         "I Am the way, and the truth; and the life; no one comes to the Father but through Me" 
           John 14:6

         "I Am the vine" John 15:5

         "I AM He" John 18:6

         Every One of those "I Am" statements represents Jesus' own claim to deity.

         The clincher comes, however, in John 8:24; because in this verse, Jesus said, 

          "Therefore I said to you that you will die in your sins; for unless you believe that
             I am He, you will die in your sins”

          The word "He" does not appear in the original Greek, and the words "I am" are the words
          "Ego Eimi"; so, it literally reads like this; it says, 

            “...unless you believe that I am the I Am you will die in your sins” 


           “…unless you believe that I am ‘Jehovah’ you will die in your sins”  

          Finally, in Acts 1:8, Jesus said this just prior to His ascension; He said, 

          "but you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you; and you shall be 
           My witnesses both in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and even to the remotest
           part of the earth" 

           Question = Who's witnesses did Jesus' say that we are to be
           Answer = "My Witnesses" - His Witnesses - Jesus' Witnesses

 Watch the Tower  - A excellent website produced by Paul and Pat Blizard
                                      former Third Generation Jehovah's Witnesses        --> 
    c. They Reject Our Salvation 

         Like all other cults, the Jehovah's Witnesses have rejected our gospel of grace  in favor
    of a false gospel based on works.     According to a Watchtower Magazine dated February 
    15th, 1983 Pages 12-13, those who hope to receive everlasting life must identify themselves
    with "That Organization" (The Watchtower Society) and serve God as part of it.   They also
    stated in a Watchtower Magazine dated April 1st, 1947 "to get one's name written in the Book
    of Life will depend upon one's works."   They also teach that the only ones who will get to go
    to Heaven are in an elite group of just 144,000, and that these are selected because of their
    good works.  The Jehovah's Witnesses are obviously and seriously mistaken at this point.
    For you see, these 144,000 are clearly described in Revelation 7:4-8 as 12,000 from each
    tribe of Israel; and in the very next verse, Revelation 7:9, the Bible says, 

    "9 After these things I looked, and behold, a great multitude which no one could count, 
      from every nation and all tribes and peoples and tongues, standing before the throne 
      and before the Lamb, clothed in white robes, and palm branches were in their hands" 

    I am able to count to 144,000, and most people are; yet, in this verse, John tells us that 
    he saw a great multitude larger than any group we could count standing before the lamb
    in Heaven clothed in white robes.  So, the Jehovah's Witnesses are clearly in error at this 
    point.  The bottom line, of course, is this.  The Bible clearly teaches that we are not saved
    by works but by  faith alone in Jesus Christ.   This could not be stated more clearly than it 
    is in Ephesians 2:8-9 and in Galatians 2:16. 

    Ephesians 2:8-10 "8 For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not
                                        of yourselves, it is the gift of God; 9 not as a result of works, 
                                        so that no one may boast"

    Galatians 2:16 "nevertheless knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the Law 
                                  but through faith in Christ Jesus, even we have believed in Christ Jesus, 
                                  so that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by the works of the
                                  Law; since by the works of the Law no flesh will be justified"